The criminal writ petitioner sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to seek discharge. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn in terms. No substantive decision on merits was recorded.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek discharge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
947-Cri.WP.155 of 2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.155 OF 2023
KUSUM @ BHIMA W/O. SUDAM THORAT
VERSUS
THE INVESTIGATION OFFICER, CANTONMENT POLICE
STATION,AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Himmatsinh D. Deshmukh
APP for Respondent – State : Mr. M. M. Nerlikar
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND
ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, JJ.
DATED : 19 APRIL 2023
PER COURT :
.After we expressed our disinclination to grant any relief to the
petitioner on merits, learned advocate on instructions seeks leave to withdraw
the writ petition with liberty to seek discharge.
2. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.)
(MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)
Tandale/-
1/1
Kusum @ Bhima W/O. Sudam Thorat
The Investigation Officer, Cantonment Police Station, Aurangabad
Mangesh S. Patil
Abhay S. Waghwase
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court