The Court accepted submissions that the relief sought in the writ petition had been worked out, leading to the disposal of the petition without a detailed order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
905.wp.4447.2014.odt
Chaitali Ekke
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4447 OF 2014
Kantilal Popatlal Sangoi …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra Thr. Minister, Public Works Dept. and Ors. …Respondents
Mr.Vishal Kanade, Mr. Preeti Gada, Mr.Bhavik Lalan i/b Preeti Gada, Advocates for Petitioner in WP 4447/2014. Mr.K.P. Sangoi, Petitioner in-person.
Ms.P. H. Kantharia, GP a/w Mr.A.I. Patel, Addl. GP., Ms.Kavita N. Solunke, AGP for State.
Mr.P.G. Lad, Counsel for Respondent No.5-(MCGM). Mr.R.Y. Sirsikar for MCGM. Mr. D.C. Kulkarni – AE (B.P) spl. cell.
Mr. Pramod Bungosavi – S.E. PWD. Mr. Gharat Sanjay – SDE, PWD. Mr. Shirsath Annasaheb – S.O. PWD. Mr. S.B. Bampalwar – Sub-Divisional Engineer, PWD. Ms. Mithila Jadhav – Senior Architect, PWD. Mr. Md. A Kef – Dy. Engineer (Electrical) PWD. Mr. Subhash Jagannath Mane, Executive Engineer, Integrated Unit (P.W.) Division, Mumbai. Mr. Nilesh Shinde – Assistant Engineer, PWD. Mr. Shrikant S. Chinchole – Assistant Engineer, PWD. Mr. S.B. Mane, Engineer (Elect.), PWD.
Mr.S.S. Kanetkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 6 & 7. Mr. Y.A. Rane – Registrar (Legal & Research). Mr.D.S. Deshmukh–Registrar (Inspection-II) Mr. S.K. Dhekale–Court Receiver, High Court of Bombay Mr. D.A. Deshpande – Registrar OSD (Legal & Research), all for Respondent Nos. 6 & 7.
CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATED : 13th April 2023
1
905.wp.4447.2014.odt
P.C.:
1 Mr. Kanetkar submits that all the records have been shifted to the new building, and his instructions are that the inauguration of the new court building is being planned for 22.04.2023 and hopefully all going well, he feels it should take place on 22.04.2023.
2 In view of the above, Mr. Kanade for Petitioner states that the prayers sought in the Petition have got worked out and nothing would remain in the Petition. Petition accordingly, disposed.
3 We must appreciate the contribution by every party in the Petition as well as their Lawyers in working out this Petition to the satisfaction of all concerned.
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
2
Kantilal Popatlal Sangoi
The State of Maharashtra
K. R. SHRIRAM
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
