Dismissed

Mr. Vinay a. Choksey v. Mr. Gaurang Vinod Doshi

Bombay HC13 Apr 2023APP/268/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeals and associated Notices of Motion dismissed as withdrawn due to a settled matter. Applicant to return title deeds; Respondent to pay poundage to the Sheriff before attachment lift.

What did the court decide?

Both appeals and Notices of Motion dismissed as withdrawn. Leave granted to withdraw execution application; attachment vacated upon payment of poundage; title deeds to be returned.

Mr. Vinay a. Choksey Vs Mr. Gaurang Vinod Doshi — Execution and Attachment | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

amol 902 903 nmal 2018.2014 app 268.2016.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

(902) NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 2018 OF 2014 IN

¶4

APPEAL NO. 471 OF 2016

¶5

WITH

¶6

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1879 OF 2016

¶7

¶8

NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 2018 OF 2014

¶9

Gaurang Vinod Doshi ...Applicant Versus

¶10

Vinay A. Choksi ...Respondent

¶11

AND

¶12

(903) APPEAL NO. 268 OF 2016 IN

¶13

ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 846 OF 2010

¶14

Vinay A. Choksi ...Appellant

¶15

Versus

¶16

Gaurang Vinod Doshi ...Respondent

¶17

Mr. Reshant Shah i/b. Lex counseiller for appellant in APP/471/2016 and for Respondent No.2 in APP/268/2016

¶18

MS. Mamta A. Shah for respondent no.1 in app/471/2016 and for appellant in APP/268/2016 Mr. D. S. Choudhari, Deputy Sheriff present.

¶19

CORAM: K.R. SHRIRAM &

¶20

RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ

¶21

DATED: 13^th April, 2023

¶22

1/3

¶23

amol 902 903 nmal 2018.2014 app 268.2016.odt

¶24

PC:-

¶25

Ms. Shah appearing for respondent no.1 in Appeal No. 471 of 2016 and for appellant in Appeal No. 268 of 2016 states that parties have amicably settled the matter.

¶26

Mr. Reshan Shah undertakes to file Vakalatnama by 15^th April 2023.

¶27

Both Mr. Reshan Shah & Ms. Mamta Shah seek leave of the court

¶28

to withdraw their respective appeals. Both Appeals dismissed as withdrawn.

¶29

Consequently, Notice of Motion, if any, are also dismissed as

¶30

withdrawn.

¶31

Ms. Shah states that within one week from today, she shall withdraw the execution application No. 207 of 2009. Ms. Shah also states that the order of attachment of the Flat No. 31 situated at Vikas Vaibhav Cooperative Housing Society Limited, 3^rd Floor, 31 Peddar Road, Mumbai-400 016 passed on 23^rd June 2009 in Execution Application No. 207 of 2009 be also consequently vacated.

¶32

Ms. Shah states that Mr. Vinay Choksi will pay the poundage to

¶33

2/3

¶34

amol 902 903 nmal 2018.2014 app 268.2016.odt

¶35

Sheriff of Mumbai of 1% of Rs.1,01,50,000/- (Rs. 44,50,000/- + Rs. 57,00,000/-) within two working days of this order being uploaded by way of pay order drawn in favour of Sheriff of Mumbai. Statement accepted as an undertaking to this Court. It is made clear that the order lifting the attachment will be effective only upon payment of this amount to the Sheriff of Mumbai.

¶36

In view of the above, Mr. Shah on instructions from the constituted attorney of Mr. Gaurang Doshi, one Mr. Anand Bansal, who is present in court and is identified by Mr. Shah states that the title deeds of Vinay Choksi’s residential premises deposited with the Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court of Bombay, at the time of withdrawing the amount of Rs. 57,00,000/- can be returned to Mr. Vinay Choksi.

¶37

Prothonotary and Senior Master to return the title deeds.

¶38

All to act on authenticated copy of this order. Refund of court

¶39

fees, if any, in accordance with rules.

¶40

(RAJESH S. PATIL,J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM,J.)

¶41

3/3

Mr. Vinay a. Choksey v. Mr. Gaurang Vinod Doshi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Vinay a. Choksey v. Mr. Gaurang Vinod Doshi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishwanath Manjunath Raykar and 10 Ors. Vs Vikas Kapoor and 11 Ors.

Tata Aig General Insurance Co. Ltd., Mumbai Vs Suvarna Bhaskarrao Kadam and Ors.

V K Fasteners Private Limited Vs Ganpat Pukhraj Jain

Shri. Kantilal Popatlal Sangoi Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Minister, Public Works Dept and Ors.

Shri. Avinash Prakash Bomdyal Vs the Commissioner (Textiles) Textile Commissionerate , Mah. State, Nagpur and Ors.

Shilapur Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Soc. Mydt. Thr. Chairman Vs State of Maha. Thr. Co-Op Minister and Ors.