The applicant expressed willingness to withdraw the criminal writ petition. The court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the application was granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 961-CrWP-423-2022.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
961 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.423 OF 2022
BHAWANI SHANKAR S/O GOKULDAS PATEL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Mr. Pavan P. Uttarwar – Advocate for the applicant
Mr. S. D. Ghayal - APP for respondent/State
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL
AND
M. M. SATHAYE, JJ.
DATED : 23.03.2023
PER COURT : -
. Heard.2.When we expressed disinclination to grant relief to the
applicant on merits, learned advocate for the applicant, on instructions,
seeks leave to withdraw the application.
3.Leave granted. Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
[ M. M. SATHAYE ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL ]
JUDGE JUDGE
SGP
Bhawani Shankar S/o Gokuldas Patel
The State of Maharashtra
Another
Mangesh S. Patil
M. M. Sathaye
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court