Petitioner sought premature release. Court directed respondent to consider the case on merits within four weeks.
Direction to respondent to consider premature release request within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 361.2023WP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
955 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.361 OF 2023
JAMIL ABBASS SAYYED
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for the petitioner : Mr. S.P. Chate APP for respondent/State : Mr.S.J. Salgare
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ. DATE : 21 MARCH 2023
PC :
Heard both the sides.
possible and in any event within four weeks from today.
[ M.M. SATHAYE ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE JUDGE
sga/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the request for premature release of the petitioner requires expeditious consideration.
Jamil Abbass Sayyed
The State of Maharashtra
Mangesh S. Patil
M.M. Sathaye
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
