Petitioner submitted that the underlying appeal was decided during the petition's pendency, rendering the writ petition infructuous. Court disposed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
k 1/1 38_wp_3907.19_as.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3907 OF 2019
Shri Ganpat Punja Wagh V/S Santu Barku Pingal & Ors.
....Petitioner
....Respondents
Ms. Rukmini Khairnar i/b Mr. Pramod Joshi for the Petitioner. Ms. Naiana P. Borasto i/b Mr. G.R. Agrawal for Respondent Nos.1 to 4. Ms. Anjali Binjola i/b Mr. Sanjay Shinde for Respondent Nos.5 and 6.
CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 24 MARCH 2023.
P.C.:
The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that during the pendency of the Petition, the Appeal has been decided and accordingly the Writ Petition has become infructuous. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. The Petitioner will be at liberty to raise all the points raised in
the present Writ Petition in Appeal before the Appellate Court.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
1/1
katkam
Shri Ganpat Punja Wagh
Santu Barku Pingal
Ors.
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
