Petitioners sought leave to withdraw the writ petition as the underlying suit was already disposed of. The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Withdrawal of writ petition allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
kishor 1/1 48 wp 2185 of 21 as.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2185 OF 2021
Susheela Munshi & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus Pallithara Mary Paulson ...Respondent
Mr. Idris Balasinorwala, i/b. Nasikwala law Office for the Petitioner.
CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 24th March 2023.
P.C.:
already disposed of. Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
1/1
Susheela Munshi & Anr.
Pallithara Mary Paulson
SANDEEP V. MARNE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
