The High Court of Bombay disposed of the writ petition without adjudication on merits, noting the unavailability of the Debt Recovery Tribunal Member and directing the petitioner to approach the existing alternate arrangement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE
903-wp-3795-2023.doc
1
Trupti
Digitally signed by TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2023.03.24 17:27:06 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3795 OF 2023
Sonalkumar Kusalbhau Ghawane & Anr.
… Petitioners
vs.
The Authorized Officer, SVC Co-Operative Bank Ltd. & Ors.
… Respondents
Mr. Kapil P. Shetye for the Petitioners.
Mr.Nikhil Rajani i/b. M/s. V. Deshpande & Co. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
DATE : 24 MARCH 2023
P.C. :-
The Petitioners are before us because Member of the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Pune was on leave. In Civil Writ Petition No. 3697 of 2023 and Writ Petition (L) No. 7818 of 2023 (O.S.), we have noted this position in the order dated 21 March 2023 and we were informed by the Registrar of the DRT who was present in the Court that an alternate arrangement has been made. Therefore, the Petitioners have a remedy of approaching the DRT. Any action taken by the Respondents will be subject to the outcome of the application.
903-wp-3795-2023.doc
2
Trupti
ABHAY AHUJA, J.
NITIN JAMDAR, J.
Sonalkumar Kusalbhau Ghawane & Anr.
The Authorized Officer, SVC Co-Operative Bank Ltd.
Nitin Jamdar
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
