The High Court disposed of the writ petition without addressing substantive contentions, noting that the petitioner has a remedy within the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901-wp-3764-2023.doc
1
Trupti
TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3764 OF 2023
Digitally signed by TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2023.03.24 17:36:31 +0530
Vivek Madan Kavle … Petitioner vs. Tehsildar and Executive Magistrate, Mulshi and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Ranbir Singh with Mr. Hussain Dholkawala and Ms. Kavita Dutta Sharma i/b. Kavita Dutta (Sharma) for the Petitioner. Ms.Neeta Jain i/b. Ms. Priya Gasto for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.
DATE : 24 MARCH 2023
P.C. :-
The Petitioner is before us because Member of the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Pune was on leave. In Civil Writ Petition No. 3697 of 2023 and Writ Petition (L) No. 7818 of 2023 (O.S.), we have noted this position in the order dated 21 March 2023 and we were informed by the Registrar of the DRT who was present in the Court that an alternate arrangement has been made. Therefore, the Petitioner has a remedy of approaching the DRT. The auction that will be held will be subject to the outcome of the application that the Petitioner will file.
901-wp-3764-2023.doc
2
Trupti
ABHAY AHUJA, J.
NITIN JAMDAR, J.
Vivek Madan Kavle
Tehsildar and Executive Magistrate, Mulshi and Ors.
Nitin Jamdar
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
