The petitioner unconditionally withdrew the criminal writ petition upon the judge's expression of disinclination to grant relief. The petition was allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
08-WP-3754-23.odt
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3754 OF 2023
Tribhuvan Nath Tiwari & Ors..... Petitioners
versus
The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent
Mr. Rahul R. Tiwari, Advocate for Petitioners.Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the State/Respondent.CORAM: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE: 18th DECEMBER, 2023
P.C. :
1. After arguing for some time, when I expressed my
disinclination to grant relief in this Petition, the learned counsel forthe Petitioner prays for unconditional withdrawal of this Petition.
2. Permission is granted. The Petition is allowed to be
withdrawn and is disposed of as such.
Digitally signed by MANUSHREE MANUSHREE NESARIKAR NESARIKAR Date: 2023.12.18 14:44:57 +0530
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Nesarikar
Tribhuvan Nath Tiwari
The State of Maharashtra
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court