Petitioner withdrew his criminal writ petition opposing the impugned order as cross-examination had commenced in the trial court, leading to dismissal as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23-WP-1008-23.odt
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1008 OF 2023
Subodh Vijay Patwardhan.... Petitioner
versus
Manoj Bhalchandra Patil & Anr..... Respondents
Mr. Shriram Kulkarni a/w Gaurav U., Advocate for Petitioner.Ms. Sangita D. Shinde, APP for the State/Respondent.CORAM: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE: 18th DECEMBER, 2023
P.C. :
1. In view of the observations made in paragraph No.12 of the order dated 04/12/2016 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pune, which is impugned in this Petition and since the cross-examination has already started, the learned counsel for the Petitioner does not press this Petition. Therefore, the Petition is disposed of as not pressed.
2. The trial shall be decided on its own merits in
accordance with law.
Digitally signed by MANUSHREE MANUSHREE NESARIKAR NESARIKAR Date: 2023.12.19 11:20:58 +0530
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Nesarikar
Subodh Vijay Patwardhan
Manoj Bhalchandra Patil
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court