The High Court granted the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum with an alternative remedy. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail a different remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
941-WP-3693-22
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3693 OF 2022
Suresh Mahadu Chaudhari .... Petitioner
Versus
Anil Mahadu Chaudhari and others .... Respondents
Mr. Tapan K. Sant, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A.V. Hon, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 7 Mr. S.M. Gunjal, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 to 5. Mr. S.R. Yadav Lonikar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.8 and 9
[ CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] DATE : 07th JULY, 2023
ORDER :
[ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE
S.P. Rane
1 of 1
Suresh Mahadu Chaudhari
Anil Mahadu Chaudhari
Nitin B. Suryawanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
