Shivdas Banaji Dhumale v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw application granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
Permission to withdraw application granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901-ABA-467-23
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.467 OF 2023
Shivdas Banaji Dhumale .... Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another .... Respondents
Mr. A.D. Gawale, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. S.R. Yadav Lonikar, AGP for Respondent No.1 Mr. G.R. Ingole, Advocate for Respondent No.2
ORDER :
was not inclined to grant relief, learned advocate for the applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the application.
[ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE
S.P. Rane
1 of 1
Shivdas Banaji Dhumale
The State of Maharashtra and another
Nitin B. Suryawanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court