Counsel for the petitioner withdrew the writ petition. The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn, but the petitioner retains liberty to approach the court below for discharge if charge-sheeted, independent of this withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(13)-WP-3612-22.doc .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3612 OF 2022
Subhashchandra Vinubhai Patil
..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
..Respondents
Mr. Subodh Desai a/w Amit Ghag & Vishal Maheshwari i/by V. M. Legal, for the Petitioner.
Smt. A. S. Pai, PP a/w J. P. Yagnik, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATE : 4th JULY, 2023
P.C.
[R. N. LADDHA, J.]
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
BGP.
1 of 1
Subhashchandra Vinubhai Patil
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
