Disposed
Krantikari Suraksha Rakshak Sanghatana v. Commissioner of Fisheries and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/3464/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 2
48-WP-3464-2021.doc
rrpillai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3464 OF 2021
Krantikari Suraksha Rakshak Sanghatana … Petitioner
vs.
Commissioner of Fisheries and Anr … Respondents
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2350 OF 2021 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3464 OF 2021
Regional Deputy Commissioner … Petitioner
vs.
Krantikari Suraksha Rakshak Sanghatana … Respondents and Ors.
Mr. Sanjay Singhvi, Senior Advocate i/b. Mr. Ghanashyam R. Thombare for the Petitioner.
Ms. M.S. Bane, AGP for the Respondent-State.
Ms. Sweedal Karkade for Respondent no.2.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA, ACJ. &
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED : 10 JANUARY, 2023
P.C. :-
Digitally signed RAJESHWARI by RAJESHWARIRAMESH PILLAI RAMESH Date: PILLAI 2023.01.11 10:47:45 +0530
Petitioner. The learned Advocate for the Respondent-State submits that Respondent have taken decision and have decided
2 / 2
48-WP-3464-2021.doc
to pay the overtime wages to 59 Petitioners that is due and payable since the year 2017-18 and for that purpose the proposal for amount of Rs.1,13,28,317/- has been forwarded to the Government for the funds. The amount of Rs. 1,13,28,317/would be disbursed to the 59 Security Guards and Supervisors.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
Krankitari Suraksha Rakshak Sanghatana
Commissioner of Fisheries
S.V. Gangapurwala
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court