The High Court of Bombay found the present criminal writ petition infructuous because the trial in the underlying criminal case (C.C. No. 734/SS/2016) was concluded with the conviction of the accused. The court further noted that the parties had settled their dispute before the Appellate Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
7-wp-3406.18.doc
BIPIN Digitally signed by BIPINDHARMENDER DHARMENDER PRITHIANI PRITHIANI Date: 2023.10.0518:37:02 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3406 OF 2018
Girimon P. T.
… Petitioner
Versus
Murtaza Merchant & Anr. … Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. J. A. Udaipuri a/w Ms. S. J. Udaipuri i/by M/s. Udaipuri & Co. for the Respondent No.1.
Mr. A. R. Kapadnis, APP for the Respondent No.2-State.
CORAM: R. N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 5 OCTOBER 2023
P.C. :-
bipin prithiani
2
7-wp-3406.18.doc
informs the Court that the contesting parties have already settled their dispute before the Appellate Court.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
Girimon P. T.
Murtaza Merchant
R. N. LADDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
