Petitioner originally accused sought leave to withdraw criminal writ petition as trial concluded. Court granted leave and disposed of petition as infructuous.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
4-wp-2804.18.doc
BIPIN Digitally signed by BIPINDHARMENDER DHARMENDER PRITHIANI PRITHIANI Date: 2023.10.0518:37:02 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2804 OF 2018
Sumit Jain … Petitioner Versus … Ranjan Dilip Vanigota & Anr. Respondents
Mr. Shubham Sane i/by Mr. Priyal G. Sarda for the Petitioner. Mr. A. R. Kapadnis, APP for the Respondent No.2-State.
CORAM: R. N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 5 OCTOBER 2023
P.C. :-
. The learned counsel for the petitioner/original accused, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present petition as the trial is already over. Leave granted.
R. N. LADDHA, J.
Sumit Jain
Ranjan Dilip Vanigota & Anr.
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
