The High Court of Bombay allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition, where the respondent under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 had passed away, rendering the cause of action non-existent.
The Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23 WP 3342.16.doc
Dusane
BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE
Digitally signed by BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE Date: 2023.09.15 11:09:02 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3342 OF 2016
Smt. Sunanda alias Nanda Devidas …Petitioner Ghoderao
V/s.
Shri. Ramchandra Gopala Gangurde …Respondents & Ors.
Mr. Pranav Chavan i/by Mahesh Menon & Co. for Petitioner. N.P. Boraste a/w G.R. Agrawal for Respondent No.1.
Mr. S.D. Rayrikar, AGP for State.
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATE: 14th September 2023
P.C.:
1. Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner states that the Respondent No. 1 has passed away on 3rd September 2021. He states that the impugned order has been passed under the provisions of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.
2. He states that as the Respondent No. 1 has passed away, nothing survives in the Writ Petition and therefore, he has instructions to withdraw the Writ Petition.
1
23 WP 3342.16.doc
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn
and disposed of as such.
(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)
2
Smt. Sunanda alias Nanda Devidas
Shri. Ramchandra Gopala Gangurde
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
