The single-judge High Court disposed of the writ petition against a Mamlatdar's order because the petitioner had filed a civil suit, invoking Section 22 of the Mamlatdars' Act, 1906.
The Writ Petition is disposed of as the Civil Suit is filed by the Petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
37-wp-921-2021.doc
Sonali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.921 OF 2021
Alka Anil Pai ...Petitioner Versus Sudhir Gururaj Kulkarni & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Prashant D. Patil, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Atharva Dandekar a/w. Mr. Hitendra Parab, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr. P. P. Pujari, AGP, for the State.
CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 13th SEPTEMBER 2023
P.C. :
the Petitioner.
Vahivat/Revision No.130 of 2020. By the impugned order, order dated 5th March 2020 passed by the Tahsildar in Vahivat Case No.15 of 2019 is challenged.
1/2
37-wp-921-2021.doc
Sonali
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Alka Anil Pai
Sudhir Gururaj Kulkarni
Madhav J. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
