Disposed

Puj Dharamwadi Panchayat v. State of Maharashtra through Secretary Revenue and Forest Dept. and Ors.

Bombay HC27 Oct 2023WP/325/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a Writ Petition challenging a condonation of delay order, directing the State Government to decide the pending revision application within four months while extending an interim stay.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition disposed with direction to State Government to dispose of revision application within four months; interim stay continued.

Puj Dharamwadi Panchayat Vs State of Maharashtra through… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

k 1/2 13 wp 325.20 as.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.325 OF 2020

¶4

Puj Dharamwadi Panchayat ....PETITIONER V/S State of Maharashtra & Ors. ....RESPONDENTS

¶5

Mr. P.D. Dalvi a/w Ms. T Sodhi i/b Mr. Jaiwant S. Chandnani Associates for the Petitioner.

¶6

Ms. V.S. Nimbalkar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4/State. Mr. Girish R. Agrawal a/w Ms. Naiana P. Bordste for Respondent No.5.

¶7

CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : OCTOBER 27, 2023.

¶8

P.C.:

¶9

1 The challenge in the present Petition is to the order dated 20 December 2019 passed by the District Superintendent of Land Records, Thane, allowing the application for condonation of delay filed by the contesting Respondent.

¶10

2 Mr. Dalvi, the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner would submit that the Petitioner has preferred the revision application before the Minister, Revenue, challenging the order dated 20 December 2019. He would submit that the present Petition was required to be filed as the Petitioner was in urgent need of stay. It appears that this Court, by its

¶11

1/2

¶12

katkam

¶13

k 2/2 13 wp 325.20 as.doc

¶14

order dated 14 January 2020 has granted interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c) in the Petition which reads thus:

¶15

‘c. That pending the hearing and disposal of present petition, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 to stay the Review Application in Appeal and not to take coercive steps and to maintain status quo in respect of the said plot;’

¶16

3 In my view, instead of entertaining the present Petition it would be appropriate that the State Government decide the revision application filed by the Petitioner challenging the order dated 20 December 2019 on its own merits. Till the revision application is decided, the interim order granted on 14 January 2020 can be continued. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a request to the Minister, Revenue to decide the revision application filed by the Petitioner challenging the order dated 20 December 2019 as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four months from today.

¶17

4 Till the decision of the revision application, the interim order dated 14 January 2020 shall continue to operate.

¶18

5 Parties shall appear before the Minister, Revenue on 1 November 2023 and obtain further directions.

¶19

(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)

¶20

2/2

¶21

katkam

Puj Dharamwadi Panchayat v. State of Maharashtra through Secretary Revenue and Forest Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Puj Dharamwadi Panchayat v. State of Maharashtra through Secretary Revenue and Forest Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Devdarshan Co-Op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. Thorugh Chairman B.M. Rajpurohit Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

G. a. Digital Web World Pvt. Ltd. Vs Rashtriya Sarva Shramik Sangh and Ors.

Sachin Dayaram Murav Vs the President/Secretary, Nashik Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Ors.

M/S. Jyoti Electric Trading Co. Thr. Partner Mr. Chirag Kishore Ahuja Vs Municipal Corporation of the City of Pune Thr. the Municipal Commissioner and Ors.

Shri. Suresh Shivaji Apate and Ors. Vs M/S. Dhopeshwar Sahkari Matchya Vyavasayik Sanstha Ltd. Shirala and Ors.

M/S. Pawani and Co. Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai