The High Court at Bombay disposed of the writ petition as infructuous because the underlying contract between the petitioner and the respondent was terminated in March 2022.
Disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
39-WP-1735-2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1735 OF 2020
G. A. Digital Web World Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner Versus Rashtriya Sarva Shramik Sangh And Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. T.R. Yadav a/w Ms. Divya Wadekar i/by Mr. Vaibhav Jagdale, for Petitioner.
None for Respondents.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : OCTOBER 26, 2023.
P.C.:
that since the contract between the Petitioner and Respondent No.7 is already
over in March 2022, nothing would survive in the present Petition. The Writ
Petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
Digitally signed by SAJAKALI SAJAKALI LIYAKAT LIYAKAT JAMADAR JAMADAR Date:2023.10.30 11:57:04 +0530
Sajakali Jamadar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed in light of the termination of the contract in March 2022.
G. A. Digital Web World Pvt. Ltd.
Rashtriya Sarva Shramik Sangh And Ors.
SANDEEP V. MARNE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
