Writ petition seeking withdrawal granted upon petitioner submitting that the impugned order was withdrawn, causing the cause of action not to subsist.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition; disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
501-WP.2967.2023
jvs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SALUNKE J V
Digitally signed by SALUNKE J V Date: 2023.03.08 16:37:01 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO. 2967 OF 2023
Smartchem Technologies Ltd. } Petitioner versus Grocery Markets & Shops Board, } Mumbai & Ors. } Respondents
Mr. Lancy D’souza with Ms. Deepika Agarwal i/b. Mr. V. M. Parkar for the petitioner.
CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA, Act.CJ.& SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE: MARCH 6, 2023
P.C.:
1. Not on board; upon mentioning, taken onboard.
2. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the impugned order has been withdrawn and as such, cause of action does not subsist. In view of that, the learned advocate seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.
3. Leave granted. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
1
Smartchem Technologies Ltd.
Grocery Markets & Shops Board, Mumbai
S. V. Gangapurwala
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
