Held preliminary objection regarding alternate remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal is raised. Docket disposed with liberty to avail such remedy; contentions left open.
Petition disposed with liberty to avail alternate remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
49-WP.1410.2019
jvs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SALUNKE
J V
Digitally signed by SALUNKE J V Date: 2023.03.08 16:37:00 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO. 1410 OF 2019
V. B. Raman & Ors. } Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Ors. } Respondents
Mr. Harihar Bhave with Ms. Divya Menon and Mr. More i/b. MMK Law for the petitioner.
Mr. Ashutosh R. Gole for the respondents.
CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA, Act.CJ.& SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE: MARCH 6, 2023
P.C.:
1. The learned advocate for the respondents raises a preliminary objection that the petitioner has alternate remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal (for short “the Tribunal”). In light of that though the learned advocate for the petitioners sought to canvas submissions on merits, we are not inclined to consider the same.
2. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to avail alternate remedy. In that event, all contentions are left open. The petitioners may make a request to the Tribunal for expeditious disposal of the original application, which request, the Tribunal may consider on its own merits.
3. No costs.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
(ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
1
Salunke J V
B. Raman & Ors.
Union of India & Ors.
S. V. Gangapurwala
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
