The petitioner challenged an order rejecting his application to delete pages from the paper book due to missing exhibit numbers. The Court held it could not examine evidentiary value under Article 227 and dismissed the writ petition.
The writ petition stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-2869/23.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2869 OF 2023
Eknath Deu Mokashi
...Petitioner.
Versus
Mohan Hemraj Thakkar & Ors.
..Respondents.
Mr. Vishal Patil for the petitioner. Mr. Mukesh Pabari a/w Mr. Sachin Sarode for respondent.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : June 21, 2023.
P. C. :
1 of 3
patilsr
wp-2869/23.
the unexhibited documents, the same cannot form part of the paper book.
2 of 3
patilsr
wp-2869/23.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
3 of 3
patilsr
2 issues framed by the court
Whether this Court can interfere in the impugned order for deletion of pages from the paper book under Article 227 of the Constitution.
Whether the petitioner's right to object to unexhibited enclosures is foreclosed before the final hearing of the appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Eknath Deu Mokashi
Mohan Hemraj Thakkar & Ors.
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
