Civil Revision Application dismissed for non-prosecution as the applicant was unrepresented, despite the respondent claiming an amicable settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 10 OF 2017
Mr. Hemaeaj Mahendrapratap Singh. ...Applicant Versus Mr. Harishchandra Rudramani Pandey ...Respondent
None for the applicant.
Mr. Ankit Pandey i/b Nikhil Ghate for the respondent.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : June 20, 2023.
P. C. :
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
1 of 1
patilsr
Mr. Hemaeaj Mahendrapratap Singh
Mr. Harishchandra Rudramani Pandey
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
