Petitioners filed a motion to speak to the minutes of an order dated 17.07.2023 regarding a clerical error in a surname within the petition. The court allowed the motion to speak to the minutes and disposed of the matter.
Correction of the clerical error in the surname and disposal of the motion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
spk.WP.2741.22.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2741 OF 2022
1. Rushikesh Shivaji Gopulwad
2. Shivaji Mallaji Gopulwad … PETITIONERS
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.…RESPONDENTS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Sagar S. Phatale
CORAM: MANGESH S. PATIL &
SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.J.
DATE:26.07.2023
PER COURT :
Motion is made for speaking to the minutes of the order dated
17.07.2023.
2.It is pointed out that the surname of ‘Yogesh’ in paragraph No.3
has been incorrectly mentioned as “Gaikwad” when it ought to have been
“Gopulwad”. Necessary corrections be made and a fresh order be uploaded.
3. Motion is disposed of.
(SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.)
(MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)
habeeb
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the minutes of the order dated 17.07.2023 regarding a clerical error in the naming of a party surname should be spoken to and corrected?
Rushikesh Shivaji Gopulwad
Shivaji Mallaji Gopulwad
The State of Maharashtra
MANGESH S. PATIL
SHAILESH P. BRAHME
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court