Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to approach again pending the grievance committee's decision. The court granted leave and dismissed the petition.
Leave granted to withdraw writ petition with liberty to approach again.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902 WP 295 OF 2022.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
902 WRIT PETITION NO.295 OF 2022
RAOSAHEB NANA BONDRE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Dinesh Manwatkar h/f Mr. Randive Sachin S.
AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. P.S. Patil
Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr. S.S. Agrawal
Advocate for Respondent No. 4 : Mr. S.S. Thombre
CORAM: MANGESH S. PATIL &
SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.
DATE: 14.07.2023
PER COURT :
The learned advocate Mr. Manwatkar h/f Mr. Randive learned
advocate for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petitioner has
simultaneously moved the grievance committee and the matter is under
consideration. He seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to
approach again depending upon the decision of the grievance committee.
2. Leave is granted.
3. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdraw with liberty as prayed for.
( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.)
(MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)
mkd/-
1/1
RAOSAHEB NANA BONDRE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
MANGESH S. PATIL
SHAILESH P. BRAHME
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court