Disposed

Sandu Bansi Thengade v. the Union of Indian through the Secretary and Others

Bombay HC6 Jun 2023WP/2668/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought disposal of the writ petition intending to challenge a measurement report in a Civil Court. The Court, noting the unutilized land and respecting the petitioner's intention to seek alternative recourse, disposed of the petition without adjudication, leaving the petitioner at liberty to proceed under the law of the land.

What did the court decide?

This petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to file appropriate proceedings to challenge the measurement report.

Sandu Bansi Thengade Vs the Union of Indian through the… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

( 1 )

¶2

908 wp 2668.22

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

908 WRIT PETITION NO.2668 OF 2022

¶5

SANDU BANSI THENGADE

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE UNION OF INDIAN THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS

¶8

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Patil Prakashsing B.
AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. S.B. Yawalkar
Advocate for R/1 & 4 : Mr. A.N. Patale
Advocate for R/3 : Mr. D.S. Manorkar

¶9

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE :6th June, 2023

¶10

P.C. :-

¶11

1.Vide order dated 20.03.2023 passed by this Court, the National
Highway Authority of India was directed to carry out the measurement of the
disputed area and bear the measurement charges. It is pursuant to the said
direction that the measurement has been carried out by the Deputy
Superintendent of Land Record, Khultabad and a report dated 25.04.2023 has
been placed before us. It no longer remains a matter of dispute that 9 R land
was in the possession of the petitioner and 7 R land has been utilised in the
project. 2 R land has not been utilised.

¶12

( 2 ) 908 wp 2668.22

¶13

2.The learned advocate for the petitioner submits on instructions

¶14

that since the petitioner intends to challenge the measurement before the
competent Civil Court or any other authority as may be permissible in law, he
prays for disposal of this petition.

¶15

3.In view of the above, since the petitioner intends to challenge the
measurement report dated 25.04.2023, this petition is disposed off. Needless
to state, the petitioner would be at liberty in accordance with the provisions of
law.

¶16

[Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.]

¶17

mub

Sandu Bansi Thengade v. the Union of Indian through the Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandu Bansi Thengade v. the Union of Indian through the Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sahebrao Gahenaji Sonawane and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Ramkishan Shankarrao Daware Vs the Union of India through the Secretary and Others

Jeevan Onkar Wani and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Collector and Others

Parvatabai Sarjerao Thengade Deceased through Her Lrs Grandson Ganesh Pandurang Thengade Vs the Union of India and Others

Prabhakar Shankar Honrao Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Pandharinath Tatyaba Dhoble Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others