This court disposed of a writ petition seeking land acquisition of a submerged portion. The judges directed Respondent No.5 to consider the Petitioners' representation and decide with reasons within 90 days.
Directed Respondent No.5 to consider the representation and arrive at a decision with reasons within 90 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3161.21wp
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
44 WRIT PETITION NO.3161 OF 2021
SAHEBRAO GAHENAJI SONAWANE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr D. R. Jayabhar, Advocate for Petitioners; Mr V. M. Kagne, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 Mr B. R. Survase, Advocate for Respondent No.5
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE : 5th June, 2023
PER COURT:
Award has been passed, it is restricted only to a certain portion of the land and that portion of the land, which is submerged, has not been acquired. It is prayed that the said land be acquired.
3161.21wp
(2)
3 In view of the above, this petition is disposed off. We expect Respondent No.5 to consider the representation of the Petitioners as per the policies applicable, and arrive at a decision with reasons, within 90 days from today.
(Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.)
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
sjk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can direct the responsible authority to consider a representation for land acquisition and pass an order with reasons within a specified period.
Saheb Rao Gahenaji Sonawane And Others
The State Of Maharashtra
Others
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Y. G. Khobragade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
