This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 29 wp 2534 of 2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2534 OF 2020
Kisan Shravan Sabale … Petitioner Versus
Union of India (Through) Divisional Railway Manager, … Central Railway, Mumbai Division & Ors. Respondents
Mr.K.Babu Rahjan, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms.Sangeeta Yadav a/w. Mr.Shetty, Advocate for the Respondents.
Ms.Mohinee Chougule i/b. Mr.Suresh Kumar, Advocate for Respondent No.6.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATE : 06 DECEMBER 2023.
P.C. :
RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER
Digitally signed by RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER Date: 2023.12.15 15:05:07 +0530
The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner has taken the papers from him and also taken no objection from him. No alternate arrangement is made. Perusal of the impugned order would show that the Petitioner had requested that he may be permitted to take voluntary retirement and his son may be appointed on compassionate basis. The said request was rejected. At that time, the age of the Petitioner was 54 years. Today, the Petitioner must have crossed the age of regular superannuation. Even otherwise, during the pendency of the Original Application though
Rajeshri Aher
2 29 wp 2534 of 2020.doc
the Petitioner’s request of voluntary retirement was not accepted, his request to give alternate post in view of his illness was accepted by the Respondents. Perhaps this is the reason the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this Petition.
2 Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.
(MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
Rajeshri Aher
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kisan Shravan Sabale
Union of India
Nitin Jamdar
Manjusha Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
