Petitioner sought furlough leave rejected by original authority. Appellate authority ordered review but delayed decision. Court directed respondent to decide application within two weeks.
Directed respondent No.3 to decide the furlough leave application within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1} CRI WP 237 OF 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
958 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.237 OF 2023
BABASAHEB PANDHARI CHOLE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr.Vishnu M. Jaware APP for Respondents-State : Mr.M.M.Nerlikar
...
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.
DATE : 16 March 2023
PER COURT :-
No.3.
{2} CRI WP 237 OF 2023
( M.M. SATHAYE ) ( MANGESH S. PATIL ) JUDGE JUDGE
SPT
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to direct the respondent to implement the appellate authority's order regarding furlough leave within a specified timeframe.
Whether the appellate authority abdicated its statutory powers to consider the legality of the impugned rejection order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
BABASAHEB PANDHARI CHOLE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
MANGESH S. PATIL
M.M. SATHAYE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
