The High Court dismissed two writ petitions for want of prosecution. The petitioners failed to file a required affidavit, did not appear at multiple hearings, and ignored court directions to delete specific paragraphs from their petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
wp2230-23.doc
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2230 OF 2023
Shivamsingh Vithalsingh Raghuvanshi VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others
PETITIONER
RESPONDENTS
Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondents - State
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 2238 OF 2023
Rajashri Vithalsingh Raghuvanshi VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others
PETITIONER
RESPONDENTS
Mr. S. G. Karlekar, AGP for Respondents - State
[CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.]
DATE : OCTOBER 26, 2023
ORDER :
{2}
wp2230-23.doc
The petitioner has submitted a complaint to the Police Station as well as S.D.P.P., Selu. He has also submitted the complaint to the Superintendent of Police.
{3} wp2230-23.doc
drp/wp2230-23.doc
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions shall be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-compliance with earlier directions and non-appearance of petitioners.
Shivamsingh Vithalsingh Raghuvanshi
Rajashri Vithalsingh Raghuvanshi
The State of Maharashtra
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Y. G. Khobragade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
