Tarachand Sukhlal Rathod v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The court disposed of a writ petition as withdrawn on instructions of counsel, with no substantive ruling made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903wp946-18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
903 WRIT PETITION NO.946 OF 2018
TARACHAND SUKHLAL RATHOD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. S. M. Kakade h/for Mr. D.M.Kakade
AGP for Respondents State: Mr. P.S.Patil
CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
DATE : 25th October, 2023
ORDER:
1.A motion is moved by the learned Advocate for the Petitioner
seeking withdrawal of the Writ Petition on instructions.
2. In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as withdrawn
on instructions.
( Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
JPChavan
Page 1 of 1
Tarachand Sukhlal Rathod
The State of Maharashtra and Others
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Y. G. Khobragade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court