Dismissed
Narayan Vitthal Dhutraj and Others v. the Divisional Additional Commissioner No 1
Bombay HCWP/5/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 5.2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
920 WRIT PETITION NO.5 OF 2023
NARAYAN VITTHAL DHUTRAJ AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE DIVISIONAL ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER NO 1
AURANGABAD AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioners:
Mr. Ghatol Patil Shahaji B.
AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. N. T. Bhagat
...
CORAM:ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE:07th JANUARY, 2023
PER COURT:
1.The learned AGP raises an objection to
the maintainability of the present writ petition
in view of the alternate remedy available to the
petitioners before the State authorities.
2.In view of the same, the petitioners
seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with
liberty to approach the alternate forum. This
petition is disposed off with liberty to the
petitioners to challenge the impugned order passed
by the learned Divisional Commissioner No.1,
2 wp 5.2023
Aurangabad dated 23.03.2022 in matter No. ROR/REV/
151/2021, before the appropriate State authority.
3.Needless to mention that in the event the
petitioners file appropriate proceedings as
aforesaid, the time spent in prosecuting the
present writ petition before this court would be
excluded in computing the period of limitation
under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.]
marathe
NARAYAN VITTHAL DHUTRAJ AND OTHERS
THE DIVISIONAL ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER NO 1 AURANGABAD AND OTHERS
ARUN R. PEDNEKER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court