Petitioner allowed to withdraw writ petition with liberty to approach appropriate forum. Time spent excluded under Limitation Act.
Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to approach appropriate forum. Time spent excluded for limitation purposes.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
911 WRIT PETITION NO.8401 OF 2017
SUDAM DAGDU JADHAV VERSUS VILAS RAOSAHEB GAGARE AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Bora Satyajit S. AGP for Respondents-State : Mr. G. O. Wattamwar Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: Mr. A. K. Gawali
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 06th January, 2023
PER COURT :
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. )
vj gawade/-.
Sudam Dagdu Jadhav
Vilas Raosaheb Gagare
Arun R. Pedneker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
