Petitioner challenged auction sale order. Court held no case made out to interfere with Collector's order in recovery proceedings. Writ petition dismissed as not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
9 WRIT PETITION NO.201 OF 2023
KESHAV UDDHAV GAIKAWAD VERSUS
DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES BEED AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. N.G. Talekar AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. G.O. Wattamwar Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 & 3 : Mr. K.J. Suryawanshi
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATED : 09/01/2023
PER COURT :
ssc/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the collector's order in auction sale under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act Rules 1961 Rule 107 (11)(D-1) should be interfered with.
KESHAV UDDHAV GAIKAWAD
DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES BEED
OTHERS
ARUN R. PEDNEKER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
