Writ petition dismissed as unconditionally withdrawn by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay.
Judgment in her favour dismisses the writ petition as unconditionally withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
62-ASWP-1620-2023.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1620 OF 2023
Laxmikant Gajanan Jagtap Versus
…Petitioners
The State of Maharashtra through Secondary …Respondents Higher and Technical Education Department & Ors
SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE
Digitally signed by SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2023.08.11 12:51:52 +0530
Mr Narendra Bandiwadekar, Senior Advocate , with Vinayak Kumbhar, i/b AN Bandiwadekar, for the Petitioners. Mrs PJ Gavhane, AGP , for the Respondent-State.
CORAM G.S. Patel & Neela Gokhale, JJ. DATED: 10th August 2023
PC:-
1. At the request of the learned Advocate for the Petitioners, the Petition is dismissed as unconditionally withdrawn.
(Neela Gokhale, J)
(G. S. Patel, J)
Page 1 of 1 10th August 2023
Laxmikant Gajanan Jagtap
State of Maharashtra
G.S. Patel
Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
