Petitioner's writ petition was unconditionally withdrawn by her Advocate. The petition was dismissed and any interim orders stand vacated.
Petition dismissed as unconditionally withdrawn; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13-ASWP-7122-2017.DOC
Amol
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7122 OF 2017
Minakshi Bapusaheb Wadkar …Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors …Respondents
Mr Tejpal Ingale , for the Petitioner. Ms Pooja Bendkule , i/b IM Khairadi, for Respondent No. 6. Ms PN Diwan, AGP , for Respondent-State.
CORAM G.S. Patel & Neela Gokhale, JJ. DATED: 8th August 2023
PC:-
AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV
Digitally signed by AMOL PREMNATH JADHAV Date: 2023.08.09 09:46:54 +0530
1. At the request of the learned Advocate for the Petitioner, the Petition is dismissed as unconditionally withdrawn.
2. Interim or ad-interim orders, if any, stand vacated forthwith.
(Neela Gokhale, J)
(G. S. Patel, J)
Page 1 of 1 8th August 2023
Minakshi Bapusaheb Wadkar
The State of Maharashtra & Ors
G. S. Patel
Neela Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
