The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of an application for reentry under S. 18 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act. The court held that the application was not maintainable as the original eviction decree was based on specific grounds under S. 16 of the Act.
Writ petition dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 10015.19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 10015 OF 2019
Deepak Chandmal Verma .. Petitioner
Versus
Shantilal Zumbarlal Bardota and others .. Respondents
Shri Dattatraya K. Kulkarni, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. S. Thombre, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 10TH FEBRUARY, 2023.
FINAL ORDER :
. By this petition the challenge is to the order dated 18th March, 2019 passed in Civil Revision No. 01 of 2017.
2 wp 10015.19
bsb/Feb. 23
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application u/S. 18 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act is maintainable when the eviction decree was passed u/S. 16(1)(g) and 16(1)(n) of the Act.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Deepak Chandmal Verma
Shantilal Zumbarlal Bardota
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
