The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn. No substantive legal principles were discussed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
19wp14426-23
sa_mandawgad
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 14426 OF 2023
Anuj Kashish Jain … Petitioner. Versus Kashish Virendrakumar Jain and Anr. … Respondents.
Ms. Tulsi S. Mehta i/by Mr. Samarth Karmarkar i/by Karmarkar & Associates, Advocate for the Petitioner.
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : DECEMBER 07, 2023.
P. C. :
1. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner on instructions
seeks permission to withdraw the Petition. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
( Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.)
Anuj Kashish Jain
Kashish Virendrakumar Jain
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court