The high court disposed of the civil revision application on the basis of consent terms tendered by the parties present in court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2023:BHC-AS:36442
sa_mandawgad1/2902cra349-22
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 349 OF 2022
Bai Pillo Dadabhoy Broacha (deleted-since deceased, through Bai Dina Dadabhoy Broacha and Ors. … Applicants.
Versus
Freddy D. Kapadia and Ors. … Respondents.
Mr. Satyavan N. Vaishnav a/w Ms.Nupur J. Mukherjee i/by M/s. N.N.Vaishnawa & Co. Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. Sagar Kasar a/w Ms.Chaitali Bhogle, Advocate for Respondent No.4(a)-Zenobia Kapadia-Bidkar.
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : DECEMBER 06, 2023.
P. C. :
been amicably settled between the parties and tenders the consent
terms. The consent terms are taken on record and marked “X” for
identification purpose. The consent terms are signed by the Applicant
Nos.2, 4(a) and 6 and by the respondent No.4A.
sa_mandawgad2/2902cra349-22
respective counsel. The applicants and the respondent, who are present in the Court reiterate the contents of the consent terms and admit their signatures and consent terms.
terms of the consent terms.
( Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.)
Bai Pillo Dadabhoy Broacha
Freddy D. Kapadia
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court