submits that wife has candidly disclosed the income from her investment made in the past viz. Rs.40,000/- - Rs.50,000/- p.m. He submits that the Respondent is a Doctor serving as Senior Consultant. Pointing out to the findings of the Family Court, he would submit that income tax returns produced by husband shows income as Rs.12,71,329/- and there is an admission that he is getting monthly salary of Rs. 1,93,000/-. He would further point out the pleading of the Respondent stating that his monthly expenses are in the sum of Rs.1,78,000/- p.m. As such, his contention is that it is evident that there is suppression of income by the Respondent-husband. He further submits that petitioner is seeking maintenance of Rs.80,000/- for her and her son. He submits that expenses of the petitioner-wife includes monthly rent of Rs.26,000/-. He submits that during the pendency of this proceedings the petitioner-wife’s father has expired and she has lost her sole support. He further submits that the Family Court has granted Rs.20,000/to the wife and Rs.20,000/- to the child. However the said amount is not sufficient considering the fact that admittedly the respondent- husband is earning a monthly income of Rs.1,93,000/-. He would further point out that the respondent-husband is living in a flat ad-measuring about 1000 square feet whereas the wife is residing in a rental flat and paying rent of Rs.26,000/- per month.
