Petitors withdrew the writ petition with liberty to seek appropriate legal remedy, resulting in its dismissal.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed LAXMIKANT by LAXMIKANT GOPAL GOPAL CHANDAN CHANDAN Date: 2023.09.12 10:22:36 +0530
1 (12) WP-11220.23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.11220 OF 2023
Ashok Sambhaji Patil and anr. Vs.
: Petitioners.
The State of Maharashtra and ors. : Respondents.
Ms. Priyanka A Nawale i/by Shinde & Co. for the Petitioners. Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for the Respondents-State.
CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 11th SEPTEMBER, 2023
P.C. :
Learned counsel representing the Petitioners states that the Petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedy which may be available under law.
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
1 of 1
LGC
Ashok Sambhaji Patil
The State of Maharashtra
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
