The High Court of Bombay, in an interim application in Appeal No. 82 of 2014, allowed the interim petition, expedited the hearing, and listed the appeal for final hearing. The application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13-IA.1607.2023
Jvs.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1607 OF 2023 IN
APPEAL NO. 82 OF 2014
Narendra Amritlal Shah } Applicant In the matter between Narendra Amritlal Shah } Appellant versus Uday Narenda Shah } Respondent
Ms. K. C. Nichani i/b. Mr. Baiju Vijay Pupala for the applicant/appellant.
Ms. Jigisha Vadodaria i/b. Negandhi Shah and Himayatullah for the respondent.
CORAM: DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE: 8th SEPTEMBER 2023
P.C.:
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Perused the application.
2. The interim application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Hearing of the appeal is expedited.
3. List the appeal for final hearing.
4. The interim application is disposed of.
JAYANT
VISHWANATH SALUNKE
Digitally signed by JAYANT VISHWANATHSALUNKE Date: 2023.09.08 17:58:20 +0530
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
1
Narendra Amritlal Shah
Narendra Amritlal Shah
Uday Narenda Shah
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA
ARIF S. DOCTOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
