This single paragraph order notes that the investigation is completed, the charge-sheet has been filed against other accused, but not against the petitioner. Consequently, the petition for quashing of the FIR is disposed off as it no longer survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm 1 33-wp1022.22.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1022 OF 2022
Nida Mohd Yusuf Khan …..Petitioner Vs.
The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. …..Respondents
Adv. Mallika Sharma i/by Anjali Patil for the Petitioner. Ms. G.P. Mulekar APP, for the Respondent-State. Adv. Manpreet Kaur i/by Falcon Legal for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ. DATE : 27th APRIL, 2023.
P.C.:-
Shahu Nagar Police Station, Mumbai submitted that, the investigation of the present crime is already completed and barring the Petitioner, chargesheet has been submitted against the other 4 accused persons and it has been numbered as C.C.No.74/PW/23. It is further stated that, during the course of investigation, no evidence has been found against the Petitioner herein and therefore charge-sheet has not been submitted against her. The report dated 26th April, 2023 is taken on record.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
Digitally signed by SANJIV SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR Date: 2023.05.08 10:59:43 +0530
SANJIV SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present petition for quashing of FIR survives in view of the completion of investigation against other accused persons but not against the petitioner.
Nida Mohd Yusuf Khan
The State Of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
