The single-judge bench noted that the appellant died without informing the court. No legal heirs were brought. The appeal was dismissed as abated.
The appeal stands abated as the appellant died and no legal heirs appeared.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
963-sa-228-1995.odt
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
SECOND APPEAL NO.228 OF 1995
BHALCHANDRA KASHINATH JATAL.
VERSUS
BHALCHANDRA RAMBHAU .
Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Rekha Choudhari h/f Mr. S.S. Choudhari
CORAM : S.G. MEHARE, J.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 21, 2023
PER COURT:-
1. None present for the appellant.
2. The appellant has been died. As no steps were taken to
bring the legal heirs; hence, the appeal stands abated.
(S.G. MEHARE, J.)
Mujaheed//
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal survives when the appellant has died without bringing legal heirs.
BHALCHANDRA KASHINATH JATAL
BHALCHANDRA RAMBHAU .
S.G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court