Gajanan Madhav Renge and Another v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bench dismissed a successive bail application on the merits, holding that alleged facts in the change of lawyer submission were known previously. The Court separatelyallowed an additional criminal application (No.3454 of 2023).
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed. Criminal Application No.3454 of 2023 allowed.
What the court decided
903-BA-1314-23.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
BAIL APPLICATION NO.1314 OF 2023
- GAJANAN MADHAV RENGE
- RAHUL GAJANAN RENGE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Babasaheb A. Dhengle, Mr.Tulshidas J. Poul
APP for Respondent/State : Mr. S. P. Tiwari
WITH
APPLICATION NO.3454 OF 2023 IN BA/1314/2023
RAMESHWAR SHIVAJI RENGE VERSUS
- GAJANAN MADHAV RENGE
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the change in custody lawyer and alternate facts proposed constitute a change in circumstances sufficient to grant a successive bail application.
Whether the claim that the offences involved do not attract Section 302 IPC amounts to a change in circumstances warranting bail relief.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gajanana Madhav Renge
- petitioner
Rahul Gajanana Renge
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court