The High Court at Bombay granted permission to withdraw a second appeal and an accompanying interim application after the appellant stated the matter had been settled. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the appeal and interim application granted; matter disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11-SA-132-2022.DOC
2023:BHC-AS:27842
Gaikwad RD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.132 OF 2022
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.887 OF 2022
M/s. Natasha Developers Pvt. Ltd. …Appellant Versus Deepak Kharkar …Respondent
Mr. Mithil Sampat , for the Appellant.
CORAM Dr. N. K. Gokhale, J. DATED: 20th September 2023
PC:-
1. Mr. Sampat, learned Counsel appears for the Appellant. The matter has not been admitted as yet. The learned Counsel, on instructions, states that the matter has been settled out of Court and he, thus, prays to withdraw the Appeal.
2. Accordingly, permission to withdraw is granted and the Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
3. In view of disposal of Appeal, Interim Application No.887 of
Page 1 of 2 20th September 2023
11-SA-132-2022.DOC
2022 pending therein also stands disposed of.
(Dr. N. K. Gokhale, J)
Page 2 of 2 20th September 2023
M/s. Natasha Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Deepak Kharkar
Dr. N. K. Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
