Second Appeal 133 of 2022 allowed to be withdrawn as the parties settled the matter out of court before admission. Adjacent interim application also disposed of pending.
Withdrawal of the second appeal allowed; interim application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
12-SA-133-2022.DOC
2023:BHC-AS:27848
Gaikwad RD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 133 OF 2022
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.888 OF 2022
M/s. Natasha Developers Pvt. Ltd. …Appellant Versus Anagha Deepak Kharkar …Respondent
Mr. Mithil Sampat , for the Appellant.
CORAM Dr. N. K. Gokhale, J. DATED: 20th September 2023
PC:-
1. Mr. Sampat, learned Counsel appears for the Appellant. The matter has not been admitted as yet. The learned Counsel, on instructions, states that the matter has been settled out of Court and he, thus, prays to withdraw the Appeal.
2. Accordingly, request to withdraw is granted and the Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
3. In view of disposal of Appeal, Interim Application No.888 of
Page 1 of 2 20th September 2023
12-SA-133-2022.DOC
2022 pending therein also stands disposed of.
(Dr. N. K. Gokhale, J)
Page 2 of 2 20th September 2023
M/s. Natasha Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Anagha Deepak Kharkar
Dr. N. K. Gokhale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
