2.It is these statements made by the parties and reflected in
the minutes of the order which have merged with the final order dated
16th March 2022 sought to be reviewed by the review petitioners.
3.These statements would only indicate that this Court has
not granted any permission to the original petitioners to act in
violation of any provisions of law rather, this Court has only agreed
with the contention of both sides that respondent nos. 10 and 11
would carry out the demarcation of the boundary of the properties of
the original petitioners. Therefore, if anything has been done or carried
out by the original petitioners in excess of what has been stated in the
minutes of the order and reflected in the final order dated 16th March
2022 or has been done in violation of any provision of law, the review
petitioners would always have liberty to agitate the same before the
appropriate forum by initiating appropriate proceedings. In case, they
choose to do so, we make it clear here, nothing observed by this Court
in the order dated 16th March 2022 shall come in the way of that
forum while deciding any issue raised before that forum except those
decided by this Court in the said order, on its own merits and strictly in
accordance with law. Thus, we find no error apparent on the face of
the record here. The review petition is dismissed subject to the
observations made herein.
